Re: Majority favour patois as an official language of Ja
Not one of your explaniation give ant strength to your argumant.
None of them dve delt with the 2 statements i mnade about the superioroty of labguage,and what make it so.
The pionts that you need to afress are the anility to communicate to a wider demography in commerce,and the abillity to access a greater repository of knowledge.
Jamaica do not have the money to get inor any widenong of a language acceptance for the egocentricities of people. It just barely have enough to educate it's children to achieve their greatest potential.
Rhe French was a wealthy abd powerful Empire when it's language was widelh siepersed.
Jamaica can not eve pay it's way.
Originally posted by Andronian:
[qb]
Well all a wi fi jus ki back wi mout now an jus staat learn chinese. More people speak chinese than any other language so if you want to communicate with the most people...learn chinese.
This wasn't always the case for French. In fact, if latin coservatives had their way it would never have been the case. Hell, even english was once viewed as being unsuitable for expressing the knowledge that can be expressed in French.
There's no intrinsic property of any language that makes it superior to any other. They are always capable of expressing anything the speakers wish to express. These evaluations are usually based on money, politics, racism, social status etc. Since the people who speak creole languages in the caribbean (like the hatians) are usually poor and relatively powerless their languages are viewed with the same contempt the people are viewed with.
Your first language is not something you're formally taught. You almost inherit it from hearing people around you speak it. So if Hatians speak Kreole, they ought to be literate in it and facilities of the state should be made available in it. It's kind of twisted to say: your language is bad, here is a better one....lol, when it has been serving the people for centuries! Reminds me of what the slave masters did to the Africans...
The advantage of learning a new language is to communicate with people currently outside of your realm of mutual comprehensibility. That's the advantage of knowing english. That's why I'm learning Spanish, not because English and Patois have some expressive deficiencies. Therefore, I don't see how officially recognizing and supporting a language that we already speak in, sing in, perform plays in and recite poems in can be a bad thing. [/qb]
[qb]
there is a much wider audience to communicate inm Fremch
and there is a greater repository pof knowledge assessible in French than there is in Kreole. how ould you like to chose to learm either of those language as a tool of economics.or music,or culture,ot hjistory,whay about geogtaphy. Do you think you could finmd as large a volume of texts written in Kreole in iether of those areas,as you could find in french?
There's no intrinsic property of any language that makes it superior to any other. They are always capable of expressing anything the speakers wish to express. These evaluations are usually based on money, politics, racism, social status etc. Since the people who speak creole languages in the caribbean (like the hatians) are usually poor and relatively powerless their languages are viewed with the same contempt the people are viewed with.
Your first language is not something you're formally taught. You almost inherit it from hearing people around you speak it. So if Hatians speak Kreole, they ought to be literate in it and facilities of the state should be made available in it. It's kind of twisted to say: your language is bad, here is a better one....lol, when it has been serving the people for centuries! Reminds me of what the slave masters did to the Africans...
The advantage of learning a new language is to communicate with people currently outside of your realm of mutual comprehensibility. That's the advantage of knowing english. That's why I'm learning Spanish, not because English and Patois have some expressive deficiencies. Therefore, I don't see how officially recognizing and supporting a language that we already speak in, sing in, perform plays in and recite poems in can be a bad thing. [/qb]
None of them dve delt with the 2 statements i mnade about the superioroty of labguage,and what make it so.
The pionts that you need to afress are the anility to communicate to a wider demography in commerce,and the abillity to access a greater repository of knowledge.
Jamaica do not have the money to get inor any widenong of a language acceptance for the egocentricities of people. It just barely have enough to educate it's children to achieve their greatest potential.
Rhe French was a wealthy abd powerful Empire when it's language was widelh siepersed.
Jamaica can not eve pay it's way.
Comment