back to africa

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so what is preventing the various countries from locking dem door and keeping all dem ile, gold and valuable natural resources fi themself ? dont dem is all free thinking sovereign states


</div></div>

easier said than done.....even Canada a supposed developed nation is unable to utilize her own natural resources to it's full capacity with out assistance/plundering from the UK and the USA. </div></div>
educate them little one.

[Emperah]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so what is preventing the various countries from locking dem door and keeping all dem ile, gold and valuable natural resources fi themself ? dont dem is all free thinking sovereign states


</div></div>

easier said than done.....even Canada a supposed developed nation is unable to utilize her own natural resources to it's full capacity with out assistance/plundering from the UK and the USA. </div></div>

That's because out schupid eedyat governmet signed trade deals wid dem dat sez that the US gets first dibs of our oil, electricity and wood even if our country is in a crisis.

MORE FIYAH pan KKKanada fi dem eedyat business deh...blasted tories

[Gen]

Re: back to africa

yes gwaan answer the rhetorical question dem

more pumpkin pie and vanilla ice cream

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">so what is preventing the various countries from locking dem door and keeping all dem ile, gold and valuable natural resources fi themself ? dont dem is all free thinking sovereign states


</div></div>

easier said than done.....even Canada a supposed developed nation is unable to utilize her own natural resources to it's full capacity with out assistance/plundering from the UK and the USA. </div></div>
educate them little one. </div></div>

[rufian]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TrongFooTdahJah</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Neutral</div><div class="ubbcode-body">...since when has africa been strong...?
What the bejeesus are you talking about pal.</div></div>

if afrika was never strong europeans wouldn't have wanted to go there and plunder the place so much and take everything for themself even to the point of changing the face of the originators of egypt.

And of course we know this was moons and suns ago, but it &quot;was&quot; there. </div></div>
They take what they want, you can profit from the weak as well as the strong. If it was that strong look at all the raids that took place. Defense?

[Magician]

Re: back to africa

While this thread is in progress, 800 more Chinese have landed in Africa using my airline alone.

[Gen]

Re: back to africa

yes I have seen the profile of some of the businesses they start up over there, and seen where the africans maintain that they are not benefitting from the so called trade between the respective african country and china

suh maybe it used to be primarily europeans but now is the chinese a carry the swing

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Magix_di_PM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While this thread is in progress, 800 more Chinese have landed in Africa using my airline alone. </div></div>

[rufian]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Magix_di_PM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While this thread is in progress, 800 more Chinese have landed in Africa using my airline alone. </div></div>


get a plan, get the plane !

actually the question is why we can't do like the chinese. a dat you mean jahyouth?

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

Have you been reading the news lately? Too much negative news on Africa! Of course, we all know why but still!

Which nations there are stable now?

Senegal
Ghana
South Africa
which others?

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body">JAMAICA CAN'T STAND WITHOUT A STRONG UNITED AFRICA</div></div>

LOL! </div></div>

Why do you laugh?

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Magix_di_PM</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Africa was never a unity and never will be. And so to Blacks outside of Africa as dem come never will be a unity, a dem nature</div></div>

While I agree with you that Africa was never &quot;united&quot; in the past, and never will be in the future, saying that a fi dem nature is not right. It is human nature (an a bad habit at that) and it is prevalent globally. Singling out Africans with it is not right.

Many people around the world with no knowledge use the term &quot;Africa&quot; freely and imply that it is one unit. It's not.

It's a collection of a billion people divided into hundreds of nations, and forced to co-exist in 61 countries with borders that were drawn with total disregard for the nations that inhabit it.

To unite them is not only impossible, but would serve no purpuse whatsoever. </div></div>

Uniting is the only way things can work for all for the better. Ever hear of the EU? See how tribalism has and is still causing problems in Eastern Europe?

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">In other words, slavery existed in Africa before the coming of the white man. While his coming can be partially blamed for the demise of Africans in the diaspora, their origin is also to be blamed.

In my book, the victim is also at fault. Any other way would be to acknowledge the superior and the inferior, rendering Africans as dumb-founded. And we don't want that </div></div>

Aren't you white or something you are always making anti-black statements and in all your statements, despite having a connection to JA-you can't relate to the 'black experience' at all! Why do you even comment?

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i can understand that you see the black with the eyes of the white. but your approach is for them to become WHITE (at least think like whites) in order to make it. It is the nature of blacks that got us into slavery in the first place, the slave mentality was before the coming of the white man. dem have some very smart people ina papua new guinea, me like them style.
</div></div>

[Serenity82]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TrongFooTdahJah</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Africa was never a unity and never will be. And so to Blacks outside of Africa as dem come never will be a unity, a dem nature

</div></div>

</div></div>

I have called out Sukuna on his/her racism before. Believe, that person don't <span style="font-style: italic">really</span> relate to blacks at all.

[Tuff Gong]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Magix_di_PM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While this thread is in progress, 800 more Chinese have landed in Africa using my airline alone. </div></div>

Chinese, Africans and Indians have been for a long time the most well traveled people on earth. Nothing new here. A thousand Africans collectively might have landed somewhere else as well!

[Magician]

Re: back to africa

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Serenity82</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Have you been reading the news lately? Too much negative news on Africa! Of course, we all know why but still!

Which nations there are stable now?

Senegal
Ghana
South Africa
which others? </div></div>

Yuh mean fi tell mi seh outta 61 you only find 3 &quot;stable&quot; ones?
An what you mean by stable anyways?

Anyway mi going Ghana in the morning and then Cote D'Ivorie Saturday.
Will mek yuh know if dem showing signs of instability.
Will also see if dem waan unite, especially since one chat Hinglish an the other French.