blatantly racist

[diabolical_Tanya]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The children of cousins have a greater risk of contracting infectious diseases, a study has found. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Marriages between second cousins is common in some ethnic groupings, such as among Muslims in The Gambia.

<span style="font-weight: bold">In Britain the number of marriages between first and second cousins is unknown but is thought to be higher among those immigrant populations which fail to integrate fully</span>.

</div></div>

who more likely fi married dem cousin than British royalty an yet there is no mention of dem in the whole article

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> He said that it was possible that when the link was better understood, the offspring of cousins would be considered as a priority group when carrying out emergency vaccination programmes to stop the spread of diseases such as flu or bird flu.

Such a decision had the potential to cause an “almost insurmountable ethnic” dilemma because of the likelihood that racial groups would be affected disproportionately.

In the study, published in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters, researchers found a high incidence of tuberculosis and hepatitis B in The Gambia, where second-cousin marriages are common among Muslims. In Italy, where second-cousin marriages are rare, no link was identified.

</div></div>

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article5926983.ece

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

The British royal family is that large to make a proper study from? But anyways I believe the study because there is a saying back home if you go with your cousin you will get kokobe.

[Boricua_papi]

Re: blatantly racist

.

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Diabolical_Tanya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The children of cousins have a greater risk of contracting infectious diseases, a study has found. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Marriages between second cousins is common in some ethnic groupings, such as among Muslims in The Gambia.

<span style="font-weight: bold">In Britain the number of marriages between first and second cousins is unknown but is thought to be higher among those immigrant populations which fail to integrate fully</span>. </div></div>

who more likely fi married dem cousin than British royalty an yet there is no mention of dem in the whole article </div></div>
That is a racist and narrow minded article only narrow minded racist wil buy into that pile a rubbish. Them can think what they like. We all know that not only the 'royal' family but the aristocrats inter-marry and see no problem with it in a bid to keep certain bloodline 'pure'. Bout... 'it is thought'; what a load bs from these people.

Europe have a history of family fighting family for crown and castle and offering their females to each other in a bid to keep the peace or prevent waring family bloodlines from from waging war against each other not to mention those that serve the crown who were appointed to certain positions who were bred to maintain loyalty to said crown and leader. Blood thicker than water lol.

Besides it was not just the aristocrats that was in breeding, europe have a history of it too. Look at the latest sicko who has confessed and admitted as we speak that he kidnapped and imprisoned his own daughter for 24 years forcing her to have his children sick, nasty excretion he is. I am not aware of any ethnic group who's fathers abuse their daughters in this way.

<span style="color: #CC0000">Josef Fritzl </span>- google the sicko to learn more about him.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Source:</span>
BBC
Evening Standard

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

yes but they can argue about the sampling. I would think that a place where you definitely know that it is happening is a better source. The could not use Fritzls entire village for the cousin or daughter-father test.

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">yes <span style="font-weight: bold">but they can argue about the sampling.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold">I would think that a place where you definitely know that it is happening is a better source. The could not use Fritzls entire village for the cousin or daughter-father test.</span> </div></div>
1: To address your specific point I am talking about one sicko here - Josef Fritzl
2: There is no arguing anything - he admitted his guilt; see BBC link above
3: Don't put words in my mouth; I did not make reference to the sicko Josef Fritzl village specifically. I made reference to small villages across europe.
4: In a wider note, the facts on the 'royal' families across europe and aristocrats are also evident.

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-weight: bold">The British royal family is that large to make a proper study from?</span> But anyways <span style="font-weight: bold">I believe the study</span> because there is a saying back home if you go with your cousin you will get kokobe. </div></div>
1: The british 'royal' family does not stop in britain. they have families across europe. The british 'royal' family are germans anyway.

2: You can believe the study if you want - good luck to you.

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: More4us</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">yes <span style="font-weight: bold">but they can argue about the sampling.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold">I would think that a place where you definitely know that it is happening is a better source. The could not use Fritzls entire village for the cousin or daughter-father test.</span> </div></div>
1: To address your specific point I am talking about one sicko here - Josef Fritzl
2: There is no arguing anything - he admitted his guilt; see BBC link above
3: Don't put words in my mouth; I did not make reference to the sicko Josef Fritzl village specifically. I made reference to small villages across europe.
4: In a wider note, the facts on the 'royal' families across europe and aristocrats are also evident.

</div></div>
Man you too?
Is his village not a small village in Europe? I am referring to the suitability of his village a a sample for the research.
Everybody know about incest and the royal. But would they make the best sample for this research?

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Everybody know about incest and the royal. But would they make the best sample for this research? </div></div>
Glad you admitted the incest in the 'royal' family now that didn't hurt did it?

No one said it would make the <span style="font-weight: bold">best</span> so called research. What was said by the boardite was that the 'royal' family <span style="font-weight: bold">was not</span> mentioned in the so called research. Which is a pertinent point because royal families not just the british 'royal' family are indeed very large spanning across europe and 'royal' families practice incest.

Yuh ovastand now?

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: More4us</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Everybody know about incest and the royal. But would they make the best sample for this research? </div></div>
Glad admitted the incest in the 'royal' family now that didn't hurt did it?

No one said it would make the <span style="font-weight: bold">best</span> so called research. What was said by the boardite was that the 'royal' family <span style="font-weight: bold">was not</span> mentioned in the so called research. Which is a pertinent point because royal families not just the british 'royal' family are indeed very large spanning across europe and 'royal' families practice incest.

Yuh ovastand now? </div></div>
Excuse me. Why should the royals be mentioned? They mentioned who they would be sampling probably. Fritzl is a royal?

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: More4us</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Everybody know about incest and the royal. But would they make the best sample for this research? </div></div>
Glad admitted the incest in the 'royal' family now that didn't hurt did it?

No one said it would make the <span style="font-weight: bold">best</span> so called research. What was said by the boardite was that the 'royal' family <span style="font-weight: bold">was not</span> mentioned in the so called research. Which is a pertinent point because royal families not just the british 'royal' family are indeed very large spanning across europe and 'royal' families practice incest.

Yuh ovastand now? </div></div>
Excuse me. <span style="font-weight: bold">(1) Why should the royals be mentioned? They mentioned who they would be sampling probably</span>. <span style="font-weight: bold">(2) Fritzl is a royal?</span>
</div></div>

You are very good and indeed an expert at misrespresenting what boardites write on here. You have a gift for putting words into peoples mouths. You complain that other boardites done it to you but it is ironic lol.

1: The 'royal' family was mentioned because of what the original poster wrote. I showed why it was pertinent for the boardite to point that out. You already admitted that there is incest in the 'royal' family.

2: I did not say Josef Fritzl was a 'royal'. What are you smoking?

Now go back and try to find something else I wrote above to spin and twist... this time, take your time and come strong next time.

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

go siddung beside yu fren, mek him give you one a de cap because him have two pan him head

[mangoskin]

Re: blatantly racist

a suitable study would be in some of the islands - for example, on Long Island, Bahamas there are congenital defects such as webbed fingers, and eye defects as a result of some close familial breeding practices
definately small island populations (including small Jamaican settlements) would be a good study source

[Morpheous]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">go siddung beside yu fren, mek him give you one a de cap because him have two pan him head </div></div>
Is this the best you can do? Sukuna.. sukuna... surely you can come bettah dan dis? I will give yuh another chance... come wid some facts regarding the topic and try to stay on topic this time.... smoking is bad for your health in every way lol

[rufian]

Re: blatantly racist

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: More4us</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sukuna</div><div class="ubbcode-body">go siddung beside yu fren, mek him give you one a de cap because him have two pan him head </div></div>
Is this the best you can do? Sukuna.. sukuna... surely you can come bettah dan dis? I will give yuh another chance... come wid some facts regarding the topic and try to stay on topic this time.... smoking is bad for your health in every way lol </div></div>
Well now me know wa yu problem be, me na want disrupt you.
Smoke does not have anything to do with me, I do not go up in smoke, I am not smoke, I do not smoke. If is anything me is a ball a fire

As you are so sure that the royals in europe would make a better sample because they are large enough, be the first to present that stats.

Italy was mentioned mine you, there the royals marry their cousins. And now more than ever it is clear to me that the European royals were taken into consideration
so me na even know why you bother