So who attendin "tea party" tomorrow?

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: So who attendin "tea party" tomorrow?

No it is not those voters. the ones that are demonstrating are the same ones that folled Palin and supported the far right. They are the ones that follow the RUSHans and the rest of the for right. nothing to wprry about They did not change anybody. They simply give them a reason to keep going. since they were so depressed after the Obama win.
The most difficult experience to ivercome, is the doiscovery that what you belueved is totally wrong. It usually leads to depression, on some people.
nothing serious.... We simply can't get them all.

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: So who attendin "tea party" tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the current protester are the same ones who were in rapture at the Palin Rallies and many of them are among the 12% who think Obama is a Muslim.
if you listen to rightwing talk radio they are typical of the callers(from what i see) who only get their information from one source and follow blindly. </div></div>Wow!! i sis it I sis it!1 he answered,... I knew it was not a lack of knowledge, but <span style="font-weight: bold"> fear of being photographed and added to the list </span>

[RichD]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the current protester are the same ones who were in rapture at the Palin Rallies and many of them are among the 12% who think Obama is a Muslim.
if you listen to rightwing talk radio they are typical of the callers(from what i see) who only get their information from one source and follow blindly. </div></div>Wow!! i sis it I sis it!1 he answered,... I knew it was not a lack of knowledge, but <span style="font-weight: bold"> fear of being photographed and added to the list </span> </div></div>

good one doc

[CeaBee]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

and u answered doc...and I can understand what u saying!!!!!

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nylah</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the current protester are the same ones who were in rapture at the Palin Rallies and many of them are among the 12% who think Obama is a Muslim.
if you listen to rightwing talk radio they are typical of the callers(from what i see) who only get their information from one source and follow blindly. </div></div>


you see I understand this and their veiws. what I mean is I dont get those who *didnt* think the above now having issues with this policy execution.

So, you see it as those voters who approved of the package in the beginning as now being brainwashed into viewing it negatively?

You see what I am asking? </div></div> Don't be duped intoi believing that those that voted for him is in the crowds. That is what they want the public to believe. No such thing. You still don't get it that the funders strategy si to use all to their benefir. they are getting to you too.
As many as they get to belueve they will get to vote on their agenda. That us howe they got W there and Reagan befpre that.

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ceabee</div><div class="ubbcode-body">and u answered doc...and I can understand what u saying!!!!! </div></div> Those that you don't understand is coded. for special readers only.

[Nylah]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?



i am not American doc so there isnt anything for me to &quot;get&quot;.

I was just pulling a RichD and asking a question to see what the sentiments are in the U.S.

I understand your point and was looking for it to be fleshed out a but more.

[RichD]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nylah</div><div class="ubbcode-body">



I was just pulling a RichD and asking a question to see what the sentiments are in the U.S.

</div></div> cho ..look like i goin to have to get a new MO

[Nylah]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?


u were done busted a looooonnngggg time ago RichD

[CeaBee]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ceabee</div><div class="ubbcode-body">and u answered doc...and I can understand what u saying!!!!! </div></div> Those that you don't understand is coded. for special readers only. </div></div>

[Gen]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

they are protesting tax laws in place since the beginning of time ( the most recent tax reform of the code took place in 86), as well as a bailout which started under Bush.

also complaining that obama has socialist views (never mind that some of these same people take welfare and medicaid) without so much as a blink

also, obams admin made changes in the withholding rates, means that most taxpayers are taking home an extra 20-40 per pay period, suh mi a wondah wha dem really a complain fah


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nylah</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
somebody American please explain this to me: Since Obama was voted in based on the spending package he is executing as we speak, why NOW are ppl up in arms about it?

I can understand those who never approved of the stimulus bill being angry now whether democrats or republicans, but those who voted for him?????????????? What has changed from their perspective? </div></div>

[Nylah]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?



thank you Gen!

[Gen]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

nylah there are many orgs. in the US that are not in favor of taxes, most of them fool taxpayers into believing that they don't have to pay taxes. people sometimes get caught up in the hype and forget that bottom line, if you do not pay your taxes you will be hauled into court.

most famous current case is the wesley snipes one. the accountant who did his taxes was part of a movement, an anti tax organization, that tried to challenge snipe's earnings that he made overseas, until he got caught and is now in jail.

dats why yesterday some a the signs refer the constitution (cause some people interpret the constitution to believe that taxing citizns is illegal)

add in the nutjobs who also think obama is going to toughen gun control law and yuh have 250,000

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

So they get 30,000 people to hold signs. That is not even 1/2 of 1% of the newly unemployed.

As a matter of fact it is not even 1/2 of those who list their jobs last week.
They have lost their abillity to fool wnough the people ro make a statement.

You can fool some of the people all id the time.

All of the people some if the time. but you cannot fool all
of the people all of the time.

the Rethuglican right can't even sseem to fool enough people thi stime.

[evanovitch]

Re: So who attendin &quot;tea party&quot; tomorrow?

u know i have been tinking re the timing of the 'grass root opposition to current spending'...let mi get it straight...

dem is NOW up in arms re efforts to save the US BUT neva up in arms wen all dat taxation money was being channelled to Halliburton unda di guise of a military operation....how much taxes was spent in Afghanistan di fuss time rung, an here we go again

wi willing fi spend taxes to maintain some claim as leader of the free world but not willing to spend it to save di country we live in...

mi can agree wid not spending to save some a dem rogues but mi juss no undastan di driving force behind dem anger...an it ha nutten to do wid too much taxes as dem a claim..cause if it was, dem would have been doing dis 8 yrs ago in full force