Tweet
Re: tiger, mzungu oomen ann blakks
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tropicana</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-style: italic">Tiger slept with some of the most lowdown, trashy kind of white girls out there. I wouldn't call them pretty. They are I guess sexy but in a very cheap hookerish sort of way. I remember having a discussion with a guy a few years ago about if you look at some of the White women that hook put with Black guys (NOT ALL NOT MOST) they do fall into that category. I told him that surely he was wrong but I have seen more and more evidence of that. You see that even with some famous guys like Montel. Look at the trialer trash Kobe Bryant was caught with.
<span style="font-weight: bold">Disclaimer:</span> I said SOME not ALL or MOST!! </span></div></div>
Tropi, I don't agree that a person's appearance necessarily reflects their morals. For all we know, those women could be very involved in their respective communities, favorite charities, or helping family members in need. Isn't the alleged behavior of these women bad enough without having to hang perjorative labels on them? Those labels (trailer trash, hookerish, etc.) distract people from the valid points you are making <span style="color: #FFFFFF">(and make you sound hateful, which I know you're not)</span>.
Anyway, my issue with these couples is the redistribution of wealth from well-to-do black men to less well-off white women that has been going on since WWII. I wouldn't have anything at all to say if well-to-do white men were marrying less well-off black women in equal proportions. Howerver, statistics show that that just isn't the case. And all the "marry whoever one wants to" although ideal, is contributing to the continued impoverishment of the "black community" at large and black women and children in particular.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tropicana</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-style: italic">Tiger slept with some of the most lowdown, trashy kind of white girls out there. I wouldn't call them pretty. They are I guess sexy but in a very cheap hookerish sort of way. I remember having a discussion with a guy a few years ago about if you look at some of the White women that hook put with Black guys (NOT ALL NOT MOST) they do fall into that category. I told him that surely he was wrong but I have seen more and more evidence of that. You see that even with some famous guys like Montel. Look at the trialer trash Kobe Bryant was caught with.
<span style="font-weight: bold">Disclaimer:</span> I said SOME not ALL or MOST!! </span></div></div>
Tropi, I don't agree that a person's appearance necessarily reflects their morals. For all we know, those women could be very involved in their respective communities, favorite charities, or helping family members in need. Isn't the alleged behavior of these women bad enough without having to hang perjorative labels on them? Those labels (trailer trash, hookerish, etc.) distract people from the valid points you are making <span style="color: #FFFFFF">(and make you sound hateful, which I know you're not)</span>.
Anyway, my issue with these couples is the redistribution of wealth from well-to-do black men to less well-off white women that has been going on since WWII. I wouldn't have anything at all to say if well-to-do white men were marrying less well-off black women in equal proportions. Howerver, statistics show that that just isn't the case. And all the "marry whoever one wants to" although ideal, is contributing to the continued impoverishment of the "black community" at large and black women and children in particular.
WL:
Comment