Support For Obama: Bad For USA

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Do what? </div></div>

pull out of Afghanistan and close guantanomo </div></div>

No idea; not sure if it matters who. But people seem to think the Dems are more likely. </div></div> reason enough for supporting them if those are issues on top of your list

[Derek]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Derek</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Do what? </div></div>

pull out of Afghanistan and close guantanomo </div></div>

No idea; not sure if it matters who. But people seem to think the Dems are more likely. </div></div> reason enough for supporting them if those are issues on top of your list </div></div>

They're not at the top of my list buddy.

They're just two things that spring to mind regarding the last batch of election <span style="font-weight: bold">promises</span>.

I don't give a F if they pull out or not or if Guantanamo stays open forever.

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

ok den

[Gen]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

BOAL yuh seet dough


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ok den </div></div>

[Gen]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

I'd like a country with no govt


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

i'm very interested in hearing what they see as the viable alternative. </div></div>

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'd like a country with no govt


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

i'm very interested in hearing what they see as the viable alternative. </div></div> </div></div>

like Somalia?

[Gen]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

yes yes that's the way to go

by the way yuh hear seh Couple Somalis send threat to Obama grandmother

[Emperah]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

They have no one over there who can deal wid him.
So him is a shoe in.

Neither the democrats nor repubs are good for the ppl so it really nuh mattah.

Kinda like de liberals and pc's here.
I'll soon be saying de oddah one tuh.

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Emperah_dehyah</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They have no one over there who can deal wid him.
So him is a shoe in.

Neither the democrats nor repubs are good for the ppl so it really nuh mattah.

Kinda like de liberals and pc's here.
I'll soon be saying de oddah one tuh. </div></div>

so what is your view on the premise of this post?

[Emperah]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

mi nuh tink it mattah who yuh support at dat level dem wi just put de puppet string dem pan de nex smaddy.

It is more important to support ppl at the local level where certain tings can be changed at the community level.

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Emperah_dehyah</div><div class="ubbcode-body">mi nuh tink it mattah who yuh support at dat level dem wi just put de puppet string dem pan de nex smaddy.

It is more important to support ppl at the local level where certain tings can be changed at the community level. </div></div>

so you think that the tone and direction of the country is the same w no matter who is in the white house?

do you think the sorta healthcare bill dem pass was worth fighting for?

[Gen]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

carrot juice with green food

[johnnycakes]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

RichD,
so you think that the tone and direction of the country is the same w no matter who is in the white house?

do you think the sorta healthcare bill dem pass was worth fighting for?



RichD,

Question #1: YES anyone who thinks differently is ignorant of the U.S foreign policy of the past century and now the 21st century.
Anyone who thinks Obama is better than Bush hasn't looked at Obama's record and that's because they are in denial, having put their hopes in him, voting for him and still being ill-informed enough to support him even now that he's shown to be as bad as Bush STRICTLY because of his skin color.


Question #2:

The supposed Health Care Reform Bill battle was well worth it for the Republicans.
They got an extension of the for-profit health care system for their financial supporters in the health care corporation by mandating buying insurance for all the people without coverage. It's a windfall for the insurance companies.
Obama, as noted by all but those blinded by his skin color, surrendered BEFORE the health care reform fight got started because he also supports for-profit health care and cares nothing for the poor .
Single payer is what works for everyone in health care around the world and Obama ran from that like a scalded cat.

If someone wrote out Obama's record in office so far but didn't mention that it was Obama's record, no one would be able to discern that a black &quot;liberal&quot; was elected president.

I've used this before but it fits this situation so well I'm repeating it.

During the 1964 presidential elections ( before most of you were born) Malcom X was asked about his preference; Liberal Lyndon Johnson or arch-conservative Barry Goldwater.

His reply ( paraphrased somewhat) was that for black people the choice was much like the chickens getting to elect either a fox or a wolf as ruler of the henhouse.

The big bad wolf, Goldwater (the conservative) left no doubt as to the fate of the black and poor populations in his speeches while the wily fox, the Liberal Johnson was talking up how well he would treat the chickens if chosen to rule the henhouse

Well, of course there was no choice for the poor and the blacks .
The fox got into office and the chickens were dinner after that.

The choice we now have and perhaps will always have is much the same.
One candidate who says nice things and the other promising tough times for the poor and in reality there is no difference to us chickens.

BUT.... there are enough dumb clucks who will vote for a fox.

[Wendy]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gen</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> yes yes that's the way to go

by the way yuh hear seh Couple Somalis send threat to Obama grandmother </div></div>

Dem mussi figet seh im did pap a shat inna wan a dem Pirate yeye laas year
Mek dem gwaan ramp wid im

[RichD]

Re: Support For Obama: Bad For USA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnnycakes</div><div class="ubbcode-body">RichD,
so you think that the tone and direction of the country is the same w no matter who is in the white house?

do you think the sorta healthcare bill dem pass was worth fighting for?



RichD,

Question #1: YES anyone who thinks differently is ignorant of the U.S foreign policy of the past century and now the 21st century.
Anyone who thinks Obama is better than Bush hasn't looked at Obama's record and that's because they are in denial, having put their hopes in him, voting for him and still being ill-informed enough to support him even now that he's shown to be as bad as Bush STRICTLY because of his skin color.


Question #2:

The supposed Health Care Reform Bill battle was well worth it for the Republicans.
They got an extension of the for-profit health care system for their financial supporters in the health care corporation by mandating buying insurance for all the people without coverage. It's a windfall for the insurance companies.
Obama, as noted by all but those blinded by his skin color, surrendered BEFORE the health care reform fight got started because he also supports for-profit health care and cares nothing for the poor .
Single payer is what works for everyone in health care around the world and Obama ran from that like a scalded cat.

If someone wrote out Obama's record in office so far but didn't mention that it was Obama's record, no one would be able to discern that a black &quot;liberal&quot; was elected president.

I've used this before but it fits this situation so well I'm repeating it.

During the 1964 presidential elections ( before most of you were born) Malcom X was asked about his preference; Liberal Lyndon Johnson or arch-conservative Barry Goldwater.

His reply ( paraphrased somewhat) was that for black people the choice was much like the chickens getting to elect either a fox or a wolf as ruler of the henhouse.

The big bad wolf, Goldwater (the conservative) left no doubt as to the fate of the black and poor populations in his speeches while the wily fox, the Liberal Johnson was talking up how well he would treat the chickens if chosen to rule the henhouse

Well, of course there was no choice for the poor and the blacks .
The fox got into office and the chickens were dinner after that.

The choice we now have and perhaps will always have is much the same.
One candidate who says nice things and the other promising tough times for the poor and in reality there is no difference to us chickens.

BUT.... there are enough dumb clucks who will vote for a fox. </div></div>

so you reasoning is the alternative will be no better (could be worse?) but we should not support <span style="font-weight: bold">this</span> president.