Tweet
Re: Understanding The U.S Economy
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnnycakes</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">An article at ZNET MAY contain an occasional inaccuracy because they reprint what the authors write and do not edit.</div></div>
this stateen makes me chuckle.
the lack of <span style="font-weight: bold">rigour </span>is mentioned before.... </div></div>
RichD,
If you have a better, more accurate LESS inaccurate source for the types of topics covered regularly at ZNET: a source that would not leave you as dumb as Fox or the other corporate news sources: as ill informed as the general public is,
please let me know .
I'll be at that site as soon as I can get to it.
</div></div>
accurate opinions? what does that mean? ones that agree with yours?
</div></div>
RichD,
Accurate opinions are opinions that are based on fact.
Inaccurate opinions are based on things not factual or not accurate.
If you can find a website or source that has the picture as accurately portrayed as ZNET, do present it.
You seem to doubt how good I say ZNET is so I would guess you have better sources with which you compare what you read at ZNET to find it so lacking.
I'm always open to better arguments. I look for them.
I'm always looking for good sources of ACCURATE information.
Have you compared William Blum's version of post WWII U.S interventions with what you find on that same subject matter in the sources to the right of his (left) views?
It's black and white. It's truth and lies.
ZNET happens to contain very inconvenient, contradicting and unsettling information for liberals and conservatives who have drunk the status quo Kool Aid but the fact that the content and story differs so radically from the corporate version should be a fact that has you reading ZNET and not running from it.
IMO
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnnycakes</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">An article at ZNET MAY contain an occasional inaccuracy because they reprint what the authors write and do not edit.</div></div>
this stateen makes me chuckle.
the lack of <span style="font-weight: bold">rigour </span>is mentioned before.... </div></div>
RichD,
If you have a better, more accurate LESS inaccurate source for the types of topics covered regularly at ZNET: a source that would not leave you as dumb as Fox or the other corporate news sources: as ill informed as the general public is,
please let me know .
I'll be at that site as soon as I can get to it.
</div></div>
accurate opinions? what does that mean? ones that agree with yours?
</div></div>
RichD,
Accurate opinions are opinions that are based on fact.
Inaccurate opinions are based on things not factual or not accurate.
If you can find a website or source that has the picture as accurately portrayed as ZNET, do present it.
You seem to doubt how good I say ZNET is so I would guess you have better sources with which you compare what you read at ZNET to find it so lacking.
I'm always open to better arguments. I look for them.
I'm always looking for good sources of ACCURATE information.
Have you compared William Blum's version of post WWII U.S interventions with what you find on that same subject matter in the sources to the right of his (left) views?
It's black and white. It's truth and lies.
ZNET happens to contain very inconvenient, contradicting and unsettling information for liberals and conservatives who have drunk the status quo Kool Aid but the fact that the content and story differs so radically from the corporate version should be a fact that has you reading ZNET and not running from it.
IMO
Comment