Powerful comments by Evanovitch in response to one of my comments. Much to discuss here so I have started a new thread:
Here is an example:
Well we'll disagree on this.
This would make a huge interesting discussion on it's own.
Do you think the average person (adult or child) caught those subtleties? Instead it came across as a very negative portrayal of Black people and perpetuated embarrassing stereotypes.
Looking back on it now, these are some nuances that are present today on closer examination but they were not widely apparent at the time. Ditto for the Mammie stereotype that was present in movies. Ditto for Stepin Fetchit.
Let's not forget the important part of the role that butlers and other domestic workers played in influencing the thinking of the people for whom they worked and challenging stereotypes. The movie the Butler also drives home that point and apparently Martin Luther King also addressed it.
Definitely, as one Black actress (can't remember who maybe Hattie McDaniel) pointed out she was paid much more for playing a maid in movies than she would have been paid for being a maid in real life. Eddie Anderson, the actor who played, Rochester ended up being a very wealthy man so certainly he benefited from this career opportunity but at what cost.
Dismissing the access of Black performers to meaningful, non-stereotypical roles as a non-issue is definitely a case of people not knowing their history or choosing to forget it. When Mammie and Rochester were just about the only games in town, this had a very detrimental impact on the self-esteem of Black young people. Ditto with young ladies picking up a fashion magazine and seeing only White people...ditto with picking up a catalogue and seeing only White people. This was not that long ago. I can't believe that people have forgotten this or that they dismiss this as unimportant.
Was Rochester ever on TV in Jamaica by the way?
Originally posted by Emperah
View Post
Originally posted by Tropicana
View Post
Originally posted by evanovitch
View Post
Here is an example:
Originally posted by evanovitch
View Post
Originally posted by evanovitch
View Post
Do you think the average person (adult or child) caught those subtleties? Instead it came across as a very negative portrayal of Black people and perpetuated embarrassing stereotypes.
Looking back on it now, these are some nuances that are present today on closer examination but they were not widely apparent at the time. Ditto for the Mammie stereotype that was present in movies. Ditto for Stepin Fetchit.
Let's not forget the important part of the role that butlers and other domestic workers played in influencing the thinking of the people for whom they worked and challenging stereotypes. The movie the Butler also drives home that point and apparently Martin Luther King also addressed it.
Definitely, as one Black actress (can't remember who maybe Hattie McDaniel) pointed out she was paid much more for playing a maid in movies than she would have been paid for being a maid in real life. Eddie Anderson, the actor who played, Rochester ended up being a very wealthy man so certainly he benefited from this career opportunity but at what cost.
Dismissing the access of Black performers to meaningful, non-stereotypical roles as a non-issue is definitely a case of people not knowing their history or choosing to forget it. When Mammie and Rochester were just about the only games in town, this had a very detrimental impact on the self-esteem of Black young people. Ditto with young ladies picking up a fashion magazine and seeing only White people...ditto with picking up a catalogue and seeing only White people. This was not that long ago. I can't believe that people have forgotten this or that they dismiss this as unimportant.
Was Rochester ever on TV in Jamaica by the way?
Comment