Why Blugiant, why?

[blugiant]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
witcheeooman yu narmallee mekk sense ann cum betta dan diss. diss too eeasee fii mii fii dismiss dat mii natt goinn too doo itt. ear iss a likkle tiddbit fii yu. yu eva wanda y mzungu dissmiss blakk ting den chatt bout da standard mzungu meaninn ann doan see da racism inn dat. mzungu used kulcha ann ethnicitee fii cova mzungu supremacee tings </div></div>

Here's the reality tidbit, blu: Word meanings (definitions) are standard, and do not deviate. Culture and/or ethnicity have nothing whatsoever to do with Standard English language usage. (or French, German, Japanese, Ebo, Hauza, or any other language)


And, blu, do me a favor, please... you make me very nervous when you say sweet words to me. (<span style='font-size: 8pt'>witcheeooman yu narmallee mekk sense ann cum betta dan diss.</span>) DON'T! [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/mad.gif[/img]
Thanks, but please stick to your normal rude racism that you generally flaunt to me; I believe I find that preferable.


Mek wi pleeze tuh kep wi normal adversarial relationship, eeh?


</div></div>diss mekk mii laff

since yu knoo english good, yu might gitt da pint ere. bye chattinn bout standard english yu admittinn dat english ave diffarant meaninns ann standards. once yu chatt bout standard english yu also implies bout nan-standards english too. dat y shood bee carefull wen yu use addjectives. tink pon itt standard english iss natt english ann itt onlee inn certain kulcha dat standard english ave meeninn. tink pon jamaicans woo caan carrect english peeps cah dem doan chatt standard english.

witcheeooman yu natt even givinn mii a challenge ear. peeps luv fii chatt bout oww mii bastardize english ann dem doan ovatand standard english rules

[blugiant]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mountaingal</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mountaingal</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Word meanings (definitions) are standard, and do not deviate. </div></div>
actually, that's not true. even in English word meanings deviate.
</div></div>

I will rephrase for completeness and clarity, MG. Thanks. [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/wink.gif[/img]

Word meanings within one specific time period <span style='font-size: 8pt'>(century, for example)</span> and locale <span style='font-size: 8pt'>(ie: western europe, UK, USA, for example)</span> are standard and do not deviate, although they can and do mutate over the course of Time.

In the late 20th/early 21st centuries, the meanings of the English words "racism" and "racist" do not deviate. They mean what I posted above, which is what is found in ANY dictionary.
</div></div>
you are essentially agreeing with my earlier post that a word can have one meaning in one era and another meaning in a subsequent era. no problem.

however, you are subjectively (and somewhat arbitrarily) determining the length of time in which the meaning of "racist/racism" meaning is fixed. i disagree that "late 20th/early 21st centuries" is necessarily the fixed parameters for saying that there is only one applicable meaning for the term racist - especially since the 1982 definition you cite may have been developed from mid-20th century or earlier.
</div></div>

da ting ere mg iss diss iss bout mzungu supremacee? mzungu trinn fii gitt blakk fii agree fii accept mzungu racism by agree widd mzungu meeninn. wan blakk peeps doo dat den dem affii use mzungu tings fii define blakk kulcha

[lonewolf]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That one, too, will define "racist" and "racism" as I already posted, and linguistically prove that anybody (blacks, too :rolleyes) can be racist/s. </div></div>


Of course you are correct. A voice of reason and common sense is refreshing.

[blugiant]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lonrwolf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That one, too, will define "racist" and "racism" as I already posted, and linguistically prove that anybody (blacks, too :rolleyes) can be racist/s. </div></div>


Of course you are correct. A voice of reason and common sense is refreshing. </div></div>

doan yu see da racism widd mzungu defininn racism fii prove dat aneebaddee includinn blakk caan bee racist. den arguinn dat blakk can bee racist cah mzungu wrote dat anneebadee can bee racist. mzungu power fii define blakk as racist iss wan parfect xxample aff mzungu racism. wat a ting mzungu wrote inna mzungu dikkktionaree ann mzungu books dat aneebadee includinn blakk caan bee racist. fii prove blakk can bee racist mzungu tunn too dem same mzungu dikktionareees ann mzungu books fii prove itt. mii look mzungu circular racist argument

see lonwolf itt natt reasonable ann itt lackinn camman sense. nice trii dough

[lonewolf]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lonrwolf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That one, too, will define "racist" and "racism" as I already posted, and linguistically prove that anybody (blacks, too :rolleyes) can be racist/s. </div></div>


Of course you are correct. A voice of reason and common sense is refreshing. </div></div>

doan yu see da racism widd mzungu defininn racism fii prove dat aneebaddee includinn blakk caan bee racist. den arguinn dat blakk can bee racist cah mzungu wrote dat anneebadee can bee racist. mzungu power fii define blakk as racist iss wan parfect xxample aff mzungu racism. wat a ting mzungu wrote inna mzungu dikkktionaree ann mzungu books dat aneebadee includinn blakk caan bee racist. fii prove blakk can bee racist mzungu tunn too dem same mzungu dikktionareees ann mzungu books fii prove itt. mii look mzungu circular racist argument

see lonwolf itt natt reasonable ann itt lackinn camman sense. nice trii dough </div></div>



That's the craziest damn double talk I've ever seen....It's almost as bad as a white person claiming reverse discrimination.
Discrimination is discrimination. Whether it is demonstrated against a black or a white. Words such as racism or discrimination don't and can't pertain to just one race as either victim or perpetrator. Words are universal.

[blugiant]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lonrwolf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
doan yu see da racism widd mzungu defininn racism fii prove dat aneebaddee includinn blakk caan bee racist. den arguinn dat blakk can bee racist cah mzungu wrote dat anneebadee can bee racist. mzungu power fii define blakk as racist iss wan parfect xxample aff mzungu racism. wat a ting mzungu wrote inna mzungu dikkktionaree ann mzungu books dat aneebadee includinn blakk caan bee racist. fii prove blakk can bee racist mzungu tunn too dem same mzungu dikktionareees ann mzungu books fii prove itt. mii look mzungu circular racist argument

see lonwolf itt natt reasonable ann itt lackinn camman sense. nice trii dough </div></div>



That's the craziest damn double talk I've ever seen....It's almost as bad as a white person claiming reverse discrimination.
Discrimination is discrimination. Whether it is demonstrated against a black or a white. Words such as racism or discrimination don't and can't pertain to just one race as either victim or perpetrator. Words are universal. </div></div>

wurds ar universal. wat yu meen bye universal? universal iss mzungu supremacee trikk fii gitt blakk peeeps fii onlee use mzungu meeninn aff wurds. nuhh dat yu ann witchee aa trii fii gitt peeps fii doo. use mzungu imppeachable mzungu source dat sey blakk caan bee racist like mzungu fii mekk yu feel betta bout racism. wile mii aagree widd yu dat blakk caan discriminate dat doan meen blakks ave da powa fii bee racist. caan yu imagine iff mii add da power fii mekk peeps beelieve dat wat mii poas iss universal

[WitchyOoman]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?


Blugiant, if you don't like the English langauge because it is mzungu, then why not use a native Afrikkan language, and forget English?
Just don't use it... No one's stopping you from using a blakk Afrikkan language.

Just don't use fake English (or bad English, or misspelled English) and claim it's "Black".
Just don't use made-up-by-yourself defintions for words that do, in fact, have real meanings (not yours).

Use an African language instead of English, if you prefer it's black roots.

Oh. Riiiight. You can't do that <span style='font-size: 14pt'>AND</span> spread your racist nonsense on English-speaking websites, can you? [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70402-thinking.gif[/img]
You need to be understood by English-speakers who don't speak the languages you seem to prefer.

[blugiant]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WitchyOoman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Blugiant, if you don't like the English langauge because it is mzungu, then why not use a native Afrikkan language, and forget English?
Just don't use it... No one's stopping you from using a blakk Afrikkan language.

Just don't use fake English (or bad English, or misspelled English) and claim it's "Black".
Just don't use made-up-by-yourself defintions for words that do, in fact, have real meanings (not yours).

Use an African language instead of English, if you prefer it's black roots.

Oh. Riiiight. You can't do that <span style='font-size: 14pt'>AND</span> spread your racist nonsense on English-speaking websites, can you? [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70402-thinking.gif[/img]
You need to be understood by English-speakers who don't speak the languages you seem to prefer.



</div></div>

woo sey mii doan like iinglish. mii doan like wen peeps assume. y yu soo hysterikkkal. wat mii doan like iss wen peeps assume ann gawn like dem ovatand wen den doan knoo wat dem chattinn bout. iinglish a fark tongue sintinn dat y yu appearently doan gitt itt. woo sey wen yu chattinn iinglish yu natt usinn afrikkan sinting dat yu doan ovatand

now goo trii fii ovatand da iinglish meeninn aff assume, hysterical, appearently. den yu might gitt y prescribe iinglisk iss inflammable

[WitchyOoman]

Re: Why Blugiant, why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: blugiant</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
babble babble babble babble babble babble. babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble. babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble.babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble. babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble. babble babble babble babble babble babble.

babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble. babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble</div></div>

Like I said - You can't [speak non-standard blakk iinglisk] <span style='font-size: 14pt'>AND</span> spread your racist nonsense on English-speaking websites, can you? [img]/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/70402-thinking.gif[/img]
You need to be understood by English-speakers who don't speak the languages you seem to prefer.
Just as I already said it...

Furthermore - I am hardly the only person on j'com who has admitted publicly that they do not bother - or care to try - to read or decipher your babble.

You know that's true. (so does everybody else)