Re: The Murder of Robert Hill
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That is like not being able to recognize the difference between causative forces and correlated events. That is what happened when some young researcher concluded that immigrants were more resistant to asthma than locally born ,even more than the children of the immigrants
it was also the case when the belief that living near swamps caused malaria, and when they claimed that cockroaches was the cause of high asthmatic rates. none of them were causative, but that is why not every person can do good research..<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">based on the evidence you could just as easily conclude that a big house is a deterrent too . </div></div> </div></div>
exactly my point...
your conclusion ignores other factors
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That is like not being able to recognize the difference between causative forces and correlated events. That is what happened when some young researcher concluded that immigrants were more resistant to asthma than locally born ,even more than the children of the immigrants
it was also the case when the belief that living near swamps caused malaria, and when they claimed that cockroaches was the cause of high asthmatic rates. none of them were causative, but that is why not every person can do good research..<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">based on the evidence you could just as easily conclude that a big house is a deterrent too . </div></div> </div></div>
exactly my point...
your conclusion ignores other factors
Comment