Re: Diaspora and Air J, urban farms, students, Haiti
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">RichD</span> before you laugh consider the whole of what I have written.
The Answer is yes and no. But if you are poop-pooping information from Parliament, an interview with the Prime Minister, numerous other reports and public speeches, then none of us on this board will have anything to work with, since not one of us is privy to a seat at any of these negotiations.
The very same report <span style="font-style: italic">(of which I heard a fuller account)</span>, is the basis of these last conversation on this subject. It is from the same you drew your question, which I attempted to answer.
The very question you asked must have been considered in Parliament, since it would have been an easy political point to score. To back the PM in a corner and to prove that he is lying about needing to sell the Airlines to pay debts would have been easy pickings were it was available.
</div></div>
easy political picking of you don't have skeletons in your closet too.
On the surface what the PM has said is not untrue. the accumulated losses of the airline are inf act in the range of $1.2 billion...however anybody who has any exposure to accounting would know that this does not directly translate to debt..however it is convenient to use this number and a lack of understanding of what it actually meas in order to garner political support for his argument.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">RichD</span> before you laugh consider the whole of what I have written.
The Answer is yes and no. But if you are poop-pooping information from Parliament, an interview with the Prime Minister, numerous other reports and public speeches, then none of us on this board will have anything to work with, since not one of us is privy to a seat at any of these negotiations.
The very same report <span style="font-style: italic">(of which I heard a fuller account)</span>, is the basis of these last conversation on this subject. It is from the same you drew your question, which I attempted to answer.
The very question you asked must have been considered in Parliament, since it would have been an easy political point to score. To back the PM in a corner and to prove that he is lying about needing to sell the Airlines to pay debts would have been easy pickings were it was available.
</div></div>
easy political picking of you don't have skeletons in your closet too.
On the surface what the PM has said is not untrue. the accumulated losses of the airline are inf act in the range of $1.2 billion...however anybody who has any exposure to accounting would know that this does not directly translate to debt..however it is convenient to use this number and a lack of understanding of what it actually meas in order to garner political support for his argument.
Comment