If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go seh

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Come on man give me a little more credit dan dat...I are insulted... </div></div>

sorry mi nuh mean to insult you i jus trying to gauge yuh.

I don't understand why if you don't trust the President word you would believe when he tell you they have captured rather than killed.

[remo]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Come on man give me a little more credit dan dat...I are insulted... </div></div>

sorry mi nuh mean to insult you i jus trying to gauge yuh.

I don't understand why if you don't trust the President word you would believe when he tell you they have captured rather than killed. </div></div>

The way it was done and the many different stories afterward and the sea burial and the shot in the head which render any photo even if published null and void..is troubling to me
a just so mi see it

but den again mi nuh no why mi surprise a suh dem yankee du dem things hap hazzard

[Wendy]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

DWL I love it!

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Come on man give me a little more credit dan dat...I are insulted... </div></div>

sorry mi nuh mean to insult you i jus trying to gauge yuh.

I don't understand why if you don't trust the President word you would believe when he tell you they have captured rather than killed. </div></div>

The way it was done and the many different stories afterward and the sea burial and the shot in the head which render any photo even if published null and void..is troubling to me
a just so mi see it </div></div>

do you think if he was alive he would send a message to embarass the US at this time?

[remo]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Come on man give me a little more credit dan dat...I are insulted... </div></div>

sorry mi nuh mean to insult you i jus trying to gauge yuh.

I don't understand why if you don't trust the President word you would believe when he tell you they have captured rather than killed. </div></div>

The way it was done and the many different stories afterward and the sea burial and the shot in the head which render any photo even if published null and void..is troubling to me
a just so mi see it </div></div>

do you think if he was alive he would send a message to embarass the US at this time? </div></div>
dats just it my son I wanted conclusive evidence dat him rely dead and so far I dont have it..an apart from taking dem werd for it which I have already stated I wont do
there are folks like you who believe every thing they tell you an den there are some like me who take what they say with a grain of salt
truss mi it good if is reely him dem get..but where is di proof..is dat too much fi ask?

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

I still trying to put my finger on what you would consider proof. The president of the US come out and say he is satified with the DNA testing and the pictures and he is happy to stand behind the statement that they have killed OBL and that is not enough proof for you?
would you be able to identify bin laden if you saw him up close? so if they showed somebody on TV who they claim is him you would have believed them?

[remo]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

The President say this and the President say that all hear say...and we have already establish the fact that I dont believe one word any Politrixian say......Where does that leave us?you believe what you want and so will I...Let's leave it there....

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

even Micheal Manley?

[remo]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">even Micheal Manley? </div></div>

Micheal Manley was GOD!!!!!

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">even Micheal Manley? </div></div>

Micheal Manley was GOD!!!!! </div></div>



aye sah

yuh know mi jus had to fling dat

[remo]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">even Micheal Manley? </div></div>

Micheal Manley was GOD!!!!! </div></div>



aye sah

yuh know mi jus had to fling dat </div></div>

No worries
dis is why mi nuh like Manchester people

[Skelly]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kotch_Foot_Milo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm officially Osamad out.

Stale news! </div></div>

like

[Xavier]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

Years ago I read a great article on conspiracies and how difficult it is to keep one. The basic argument was that people cannot keep quite and we love to talks. Everyone wants to be the person with the biggest &quot;scoop&quot;. The bigger the &quot;scoop&quot; the harder it is for you to keep it a secret. The article also had a scientific multiplier showing how many people would know about a conspiracy if say 10 people were involved (example wife, wife's best friend, son, daughter etc). It cited how the inner circle of some of the best kept secrets told family who eventually told others. Unfortunately I cannot find the article again but below is a snippet of an article I found that is interesting and has a similar argument.

<span style="font-weight: bold">

Why People Believe in Conspiracies - A skeptic's take on the public's fascination with disinformation</span>
Source: Scientific American
Author: Michael Shermer

After a public lecture in 2005, I was buttonholed by a documentary filmmaker with Michael Moore-ish ambitions of exposing the conspiracy behind 9/11. “You mean the conspiracy by Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda to attack the United States?” I asked rhetorically, knowing what was to come.

“That’s what they want you to believe,” he said. “Who is they?” I queried. “The government,” he whispered, as if “they” might be listening at that very moment. “But didn’t Osama and some members of al Qaeda not only say they did it,” I reminded him, “they gloated about what a glorious triumph it was?”

“Oh, you’re talking about that video of Osama,” he rejoined knowingly. “That was faked by the CIA and leaked to the American press to mislead us. There has been a disinformation campaign going on ever since 9/11.”

Conspiracies do happen, of course. Abraham Lincoln was the victim of an assassination conspiracy, as was Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand, gunned down by the Serbian secret society called Black Hand. The attack on Pearl Harbor was a Japanese conspiracy (although some conspiracists think Franklin Roosevelt was in on it). Watergate was a conspiracy (that Richard Nixon was in on). How can we tell the difference between information and disinformation? As Kurt Cobain, the rocker star of Nirvana, once growled in his grunge lyrics shortly before his death from a self-inflicted (or was it?) gunshot to the head, “Just because you’re paranoid don’t mean they’re not after you.”
But as former Nixon aide G. Gordon Liddy once told me (and he should know!), the problem with government conspiracies is that bureaucrats are incompetent and people can’t keep their mouths shut. Complex conspiracies are difficult to pull off, and so many people want their quarter hour of fame that even the Men in Black couldn’t squelch the squealers from spilling the beans. So there’s a good chance that the more elaborate a conspiracy theory is, and the more people that would need to be involved, the less likely it is true.

Why do people believe in highly improbable conspiracies? In previous columns I have provided partial answers, citing patternicity (the tendency to find meaningful patterns in random noise) and agenticity (the bent to believe the world is controlled by invisible intentional agents). Conspiracy theories connect the dots of random events into meaningful patterns and then infuse those patterns with intentional agency. Add to those propensities the confirmation bias (which seeks and finds confirmatory evidence for what we already believe) and the hindsight bias (which tailors after-the-fact explanations to what we already know happened), and we have the foundation for conspiratorial cognition.

Read the rest here Scientific American

[RichD]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So there’s a good chance that the more elaborate a conspiracy theory is, and the more people that would need to be involved, the less likely it is true.</div></div>

[evanovitch]

Re: If Al Queda seh him dead whe di naysayers a go

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: remo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RichD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">even Micheal Manley? </div></div>

Micheal Manley was GOD!!!!! </div></div>
So dat mean him no dead..a juss conspiracist spread rumor bout him dead cause u done know seh gawd cyan dead.. Lol


So