What is the purpose of a discussion board?

[RichD]

soo yuh puttinn yuh time limit pon oww much thyme yuh tink a parsan shood grief and move on?

do yuh tink shi shood cum pon ear ann discuss itt knowing dat shi will open arself upp to camments ann criticisms dat can hurt ar

yuh mixing up stories blu ..catch up

[WitchyOoman]

but mi did hear seh only blk ppl is bad mind

That's racist, dahjah. You can't say that about "all blacks".

[Emperah]

That's racist, dahjah. You can't say that about "all blacks".

a nuh me sayt mi jus quote de game


Blu did ahx unno fi a PM fi mek him ketchup an it look like none a unno gi de man wah mi requess fah suh yuh cyaan blame him fi run inna de direction him get sended

[RichD]

Blu did ahx unno fi a PM fi mek him ketchup an it look like none a unno gi de man wah mi requess fah suh yuh cyaan blame him fi run inna de direction him get sended

[blugiant]

that is not the story Lonewolf was involved with

so yuh making you comments based on incorrect facts

inccorect facts ar a deeper ovatandinn aff wat beeinn discussed?

so wat yuh seyinn iss dat yuh tink diss tredd iss onlee bout wan inceedent.

mii read ann memba wat appen to m. plus iff yuh goo back ann check yu will awlso saw dat mii poas wan tredd pon da prof ja nitemare ting furst.

itt peeps pon ear dat tryinn fe reduce diss to onlee wan issue wen diss tredd ave fe do widd sum badminded posters ann lurkers woo tryinn fe censar peeps

[blugiant]

i think you referring to a different case. the case in question is some university professor who seh a jamaican guy name yuan chop har. and she went to the news media to tell the story. smaddy on here was able to find her contact info from the university site, and alerted her to the discussion on this board.

i think that's what's this thread is about.

mg yuh ann peeps pon yah kno wen mii chow carn itt bout nyam sum leff sum tings cah aalf da storee natt being told

itt bout jam.com root ann kulcha wear itt natt onlee bout wan ting

[RichD]

inccorect facts ar a deeper ovatandinn aff wat beeinn discussed?

so wat yuh seyinn iss dat yuh tink diss tredd iss onlee bout wan inceedent.

mii read ann memba wat appen to m. plus iff yuh goo back ann check yu will awlso saw dat mii poas wan tredd pon da prof ja nitemare ting furst.

itt peeps pon ear dat tryinn fe reduce diss to onlee wan issue wen diss tredd ave fe do widd sum badminded posters ann lurkers woo tryinn fe censar peeps

yuh is a real spin master.

no im saying that you accusin Lonewofl of "tracking down " lady who family was killed is not factual.

that lonewolf contacted the lady who was the subject of a story in the NY paper .




and you trying to play like is because of the lady grief that this topic was brought forward and not that the person who bring it forward was ashamed of their r behavior and that is why dem a bawl now...how come nobody else who had comment in that thread feel anyting more dan sadness for the lady when her family come gi some background to that sad story?

[WitchyOoman]

yuh is a real spin master.

And you just figured this out, RichD, did you?
You take the short yellow bus often, do you, then?

[WitchyOoman]

inccorect facts ar a deeper ovatandinn aff wat beeinn discussed?

so wat yuh seyinn iss dat yuh tink diss tredd iss onlee bout wan inceedent.

Blu's got you here, RichD.

He's right bout this ^.

[blugiant]

wooiii

Maybe I should start using such a disclaimer, ROTFLMAOooooooo

This is what I actually love about chatting with you, blu: You and I often disagree at least partially, if not totally - but you and i have always kept it respectful between us! (And, honestly, I'll tell the rest of J'com that it's truth that often I disagree with you and then Mr Witchy comes along and tell me - much to my shock damned near very time! - that he agrees with you, Blu!!) This always chagrins me, too, doesn't it? lol




I don't really know how to comment, I freely admit that I am not familiar enough with Jamaican law.

If smaddy would like to enlighten me, then I'll gladly engage in discussion about it.

da reason y mr witchee moas aff de thyme side widd mii iss cah imm see da biggar issue ann imm ave a bettar ovatandinn bout metacognition dan yuh. itt like diss tread peeps tink dem kno wat itt reallee bout so wen mii raised issues dat qwestian dem ovatandinn dem tink mii reallee doan ovatand. wen itt dem dat doan ovatand de nuances

since deer iss reallee no such ting as free speech, satire disclaimer affar more protectshan. dat y comedian can sey ting peeps percieve as mean ann affensive. merikka law ting

[RichD]

itt like diss tread peeps tink dem kno wat itt reallee bout so wen mii raised issues dat qwestian dem ovatandinn dem tink mii reallee doan ovatand. wen itt dem dat doan ovatand de nuances

i think you see a lot more than is there...sure those might be underlying issues on the forum that are on some peoples minds but i don't think is that depth this thread was comin from.

if it was dat angle dem did have in mind why dem tak the direction that some how X-man would have a solution as simple as a rule

[blugiant]

yuh is a real spin master.

no im saying that you accusin Lonewofl of "tracking down " lady who family was killed is not factual.

that lonewolf contacted the lady who was the subject of a story in the NY paper .




and you trying to play like is because of the lady grief that this topic was brought forward and not that the person who bring it forward was ashamed of their r behavior and that is why dem a bawl now...how come nobody else who had comment in that thread feel anyting more dan sadness for the lady when her family come gi some background to that sad story?

natt accussinn lonwolf aff doinn aneeting

iss deer anee proof lonwolf sed dat imm didd?

realitee iss mii will defend lonwolf rite fe poas ting dat affend blakks

aneewan cood ave went to da college website wear shi wukk ann got ar email address so mii wood neva accuse

richd mii juss memba da sumwan pon yah contacted mi school ann tried fe gitt ar fired. dat was natt rite

deer ave been addar incidents pon yah ann included contactinn grievinn peeps relatives wen wi give opinions pon certain stories. opinions ar natt facts but even da facts ar qwestionable

realitee iss dat sumthyme peeps pon yah kno sum aff da peeps inn da news ann contactinn peeps inn a effart to set da recard straight iss natt badd butt wen peeps pon yah decide fe carry news even iff itt compound peeps suffarinn dat nuh rite

jamaica whistle blower tings but widd malicious intent

[RichD]

natt accussinn lonwolf aff doinn aneeting

iss deer anee proof lonwolf sed dat imm didd?

so what yuh did mean by this?

trickkee issues goinn on ear

lonwolf cum xxplain yuself cah itt sund like yu a carry news fe create canflicts

mii doan rate infarmers

lonwolf didd yuh tink bout oww yuh action wood cantribute to da ooman grief befoure yuh tracked ar dunn?

realitee iss mii will defend lonwolf rite fe poas ting dat affend blakks

aneewan cood ave went to da college website wear shi wukk ann got ar email address so mii wood neva accuse

richd mii juss memba da sumwan pon yah contacted mi school ann tried fe gitt ar fired. dat was natt rite

deer ave been addar incidents pon yah ann included contactinn grievinn peeps relatives wen wi give opinions pon certain stories. opinions ar natt facts but even da facts ar qwestionable

realitee iss dat sumthyme peeps pon yah kno sum aff da peeps inn da news ann contactinn peeps inn a effart to set da recard straight iss natt badd butt wen peeps pon yah decide fe carry news even iff itt compound peeps suffarinn dat nuh rite

jamaica whistle blower tings but widd malicious intent

yes i agree that those things have happend and dem not right.

and dem been hashed over again and again.

nobody able to identify the bad minded ppl a nd no rule can be put in place to prevent it as long as this is a public forum.

[blugiant]

but mi did hear seh only blk ppl is bad mind

mii bunn out awl badd minded peeps widdout regard to race

yu figgit dat badd minded oyinbo pon yah tried fe gitt mii banned cah dem neva luv wen mii chatt da trooth. sum oyinbo even sed mii onlee bunn fiyah pon oyinbo like mii dat simple minded wen da issue fe push iss fe blakk upliftment

emparah oww do yuh view diss tredd given yuh opinions pon internet gangsta? free speech iss not reallee free but shood peeps ave da anonymity ann privacy fe poas affensive tings. oww yuh can defend free speech widdout defendinn da privacy ann anonymity dat iss sumethye required?

[RichD]

shood peeps ave da anonymity ann privacy fe poas affensive tings. oww yuh can defend free speech widdout defendinn da privacy ann anonymity dat iss sumethye required?

who anonymity and privacy unda fire now that wasn't unda fire lat year or the year before?

who not defending anonymity?