dem bruk Bolt house

[evanovitch]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: J kid</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Dis sound like wan ah dem heated discussions/debate wi use fi hav ah yawd, dung ah di street cana shop, under di big lincomvite(sp) tree, ah katch pan wan tree legged stool. </div></div>

u heard!!!!! Wikked don't

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">All you have to do is to compare their status with those who's fore fathers were paid. </div></div>
Can you <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">name</span> those whose forefathers were paid? </div></div>Why should I repeat what is the history of Jamaica because you refused to study it when you were in school?

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">All you have to do is to compare their status with those who's fore fathers were paid. </div></div>
Can you <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">name</span> those whose forefathers were paid? </div></div>Why should I repeat what is the history of Jamaica because you refused to study it when you were in school? </div></div>
<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Can you </span>name the one who descended from those who have been paid?

[j-kid]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

Unnu ah kill mi!

[Dyoll_73]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Publicly-financed elections is the way to go.....</div></div>
I completely disagree. Citizens should be allowed to determine by their pockets, their mouths and otherwise who their representatives should be. What should be fixed is the way Citizens can get on a ballot and the atmosphere surrounding elections.

In Jamaica ever since the advent of the two major Unions and the political Parties that they spawned, political discourse and election campaigning have been conducted in an atmosphere of fear and violence. This makes it difficult for any individual and/or entity to get their voices heard unless they can marshal and command violent Garrisons willing to do their bidding at the drop of a hat.</div></div>

The ability, and indeed the right, of individuals and businesses to make financial contributions to the party of their choice - in regulated amounts as campaign legislation would determine - would not be abrogated. It's just that political parties would rely less, or as little as possible, on businesses and wealthy individuals.

Obviously, there are a lot of parts to the whole, and all have to work in concert to move Jamaica forward. As a practical matter, if I see that the desires of business (or any particular power constituency for that matter) and the best interests of the country are compatible, I have no problems with their advocacy for the party of their choice. It is dangerous, however, when a government is beholden to a particular constituency even when the overall best interests of the country are not served. Money can have an undue influence on the democratic process.

I'm also for reforms regarding how candidates are chosen to run for office. It should start with a fixed election date; Individuals should be able to offer themselves to the public for the seats they are seeking, and they should establish residency in that constituency; a number of individuals from one party may vie for the nomination, and then the people of the constituency make their choice - a primary system, instead of the current arrangement where individuals are often parachuted into constituencies or picked by the the party leader or top brass.

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm also for reforms regarding how candidates are chosen to run for office. It should start with a fixed election date; Individuals should be able to offer themselves to the public for the seats they are seeking, and they should establish residency in that constituency; a number of individuals from one party may vie for the nomination, and then the people of the constituency make their choice - a primary system, instead of the current arrangement where individuals are often parachuted into constituencies or picked by the the party leader or top brass. </div></div>

I think the residency requirement is most important. Just like being dual-citizens many MHRs use the ability to live outside the Constituency they represent to escape the effects of their corrupt or ineffective representation. A rule requiring them to maintain their primary residence inside the boundaries of their Constituency should be at least a reminder to them that they need to offer effective representation.

[britisha]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jah_yout</div><div class="ubbcode-body">it's no surprise jamaica is in this state; guys like you see nothing wrong when we consistently destroy our own </div></div>..another idiotic argument. Of course I see nothing wrong, how can I, idiots like you are standing in my way. What actions have you taken? </div></div>

Lawd Tuffy. no kill mi inyah tinite!!

[Dyoll_73]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm also for reforms regarding how candidates are chosen to run for office. It should start with a fixed election date; Individuals should be able to offer themselves to the public for the seats they are seeking, and they should establish residency in that constituency; a number of individuals from one party may vie for the nomination, and then the people of the constituency make their choice - a primary system, instead of the current arrangement where individuals are often parachuted into constituencies or picked by the the party leader or top brass. </div></div>

I think the residency requirement is most important. Just like being dual-citizens many MHRs use the ability to live outside the Constituency they represent to escape the effects of their corrupt or ineffective representation. A rule requiring them to maintain their primary residence inside the boundaries of their Constituency should be at least a reminder to them that they need to offer effective representation. </div></div>

cases in point: Omar Davies and Portia Miller, for example, choose to live far away from their constituents who live in squalor, many using pit toilets, and live under constant threat of gun violence.

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">cases in point: Omar Davies and Portia Miller, for example, choose to live far away from their constituents who live in squalor, many using pit toilets, and live under constant threat of gun violence. </div></div>

<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Perfect examples</span>!

[Dr.Dudd]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm also for reforms regarding how candidates are chosen to run for office. It should start with a fixed election date; Individuals should be able to offer themselves to the public for the seats they are seeking, and they should establish residency in that constituency; a number of individuals from one party may vie for the nomination, and then the people of the constituency make their choice - a primary system, instead of the current arrangement where individuals are often parachuted into constituencies or picked by the the party leader or top brass. </div></div>

I think the residency requirement is most important. Just like being dual-citizens many MHRs use the ability to live outside the Constituency they represent to escape the effects of their corrupt or ineffective representation. A rule requiring them to maintain their primary residence inside the boundaries of their Constituency should be at least a reminder to them that they need to offer effective representation. </div></div>

cases in point: Omar Davies and Portia Miller, for example, choose to live far away from their constituents who live in squalor, many using pit toilets, and live under constant threat of gun violence. </div></div>You not joking??

you mean with the majority of representatives that live out of constotuency you pic only those two?
Which prime minister in the history of Jamaican politics lived inhis constituency??

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">you mean with the majority of representatives that live out of constotuency you pic only those two? </div></div>

<span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Perfect Examples</span>!

[Dyoll_73]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dr.Dudd</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tuff Gong</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[quote=Humano]I'm also for reforms regarding how candidates are chosen to run for office. It should start with a fixed election date; Individuals should be able to offer themselves to the public for the seats they are seeking, and they should establish residency in that constituency; a number of individuals from one party may vie for the nomination, and then the people of the constituency make their choice - a primary system, instead of the current arrangement where individuals are often parachuted into constituencies or picked by the the party leader or top brass. </div></div>

I think the residency requirement is most important. Just like being dual-citizens many MHRs use the ability to live outside the Constituency they represent to escape the effects of their corrupt or ineffective representation. A rule requiring them to maintain their primary residence inside the boundaries of their Constituency should be at least a reminder to them that they need to offer effective representation. </div></div>

cases in point: Omar Davies and Portia Miller, for example, choose to live far away from their constituents who live in squalor, many using pit toilets, and live under constant threat of gun violence. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You not joking??

you mean with the majority of representatives that live out of constotuency you pic only those two?
Which prime minister in the history of Jamaican politics lived inhis constituency?? </div></div>

You didn't see the words &quot;for example&quot;??? Those two represent two of the poorest constituencies and why I mentioned them.

As to the PM, even he/she would be required to establish residence in the constituency he/she represents; the PM is also a Member of Parliament.

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You didn't see the words <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">&quot;for example&quot;</span>??? </div></div>.....psart y loylaty cayuse blind nees...even though I am a doktar i can t reda!

[Panajar]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

I HAVE TO GIVE THE CIAGA CREDIT HE DID LIVE PON SALT LANE ONE TIME.A WONDA WHY

[Tuff Gong]

Re: dem bruk Bolt house

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Panajar</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I HAVE TO GIVE THE CIAGA CREDIT HE DID LIVE PON SALT LANE ONE TIME.A WONDA WHY
</div></div>He also lived in first Community he studied in <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Buxton Town</span>!