Re: Reggae artistes blacklisted in Germany
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Meesamewan</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Just as I said - you don't get it! To you, only homosexuals will find this kind of music offensive. I would tell you that most of the world is against this kind of crap being branded as Jamaican culture. </div></div>
Not so fast Humano...here I was thinking the reverse that some of this took off like lightning because of the high five this type of music has been receiving from foreigners.
I agree that some of "yaawd music" now have very offensive lyrics, but as I said, I don't think they would gain so much popularity abroad had it not been for foreigners of similar mind-set who think it is cool/groovy/ IRIE or whateva they want to call it.
..so blame has to be shared, and there is more than enough to go around...starting with our own GOVAHMENT who didn't think some of these lyrics were just plain volatile...even using some of them in political campaigns.</div></div>
I would say,
-(1) yes, there are people world over who understand what the lyrics are saying (the ones with violence, lewdness, homophobia) who may even agree with it.
- (2)some, while they understand it, may take it lightly, seeing it as mere entertainment
- (3)there are others who have no clue what the lyrics are saying, but they find the art form compelling, the beat captivating, and they enjoy it, again, without understanding what the lyrics are saying.
I can understand that; as you know it's easy to move to a certain dancehall song, based on the riddim and the ability of the artiste to artfully express the lyrics and enjoy it on a certain level even while strongly disagreeing with the lyrical content. It is seductive.
I would say that the popularity of dancehall is due MOSTLY to the people identified as (2) and (3) above, and moreso (3). My point is that most people, world over, would be against any music form that degrades women, is crude and advocates violence.
The dancehall art form as a sub-genre within reggae is definitely Jamaican culture; again, the art form itself. But does it's lyrical content always express "Jamaican culture"? Of course, this will invite the question: What is Jamaican culture? Are lewdness and violence Jamaican culture, even though they abound there? Should we just settle for the simplistic view that it is 'art imitating life'?
And if we talk economics: is there a demand for it abroad in such a quantity that a number of artistes think they have to 'supply' it? Well, we're seeing one aspect of the backlash. I think eventually money will talk, and the artists and record companies will understand that language clearly.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Meesamewan</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Humano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Just as I said - you don't get it! To you, only homosexuals will find this kind of music offensive. I would tell you that most of the world is against this kind of crap being branded as Jamaican culture. </div></div>
Not so fast Humano...here I was thinking the reverse that some of this took off like lightning because of the high five this type of music has been receiving from foreigners.
I agree that some of "yaawd music" now have very offensive lyrics, but as I said, I don't think they would gain so much popularity abroad had it not been for foreigners of similar mind-set who think it is cool/groovy/ IRIE or whateva they want to call it.
..so blame has to be shared, and there is more than enough to go around...starting with our own GOVAHMENT who didn't think some of these lyrics were just plain volatile...even using some of them in political campaigns.</div></div>
I would say,
-(1) yes, there are people world over who understand what the lyrics are saying (the ones with violence, lewdness, homophobia) who may even agree with it.
- (2)some, while they understand it, may take it lightly, seeing it as mere entertainment
- (3)there are others who have no clue what the lyrics are saying, but they find the art form compelling, the beat captivating, and they enjoy it, again, without understanding what the lyrics are saying.
I can understand that; as you know it's easy to move to a certain dancehall song, based on the riddim and the ability of the artiste to artfully express the lyrics and enjoy it on a certain level even while strongly disagreeing with the lyrical content. It is seductive.
I would say that the popularity of dancehall is due MOSTLY to the people identified as (2) and (3) above, and moreso (3). My point is that most people, world over, would be against any music form that degrades women, is crude and advocates violence.
The dancehall art form as a sub-genre within reggae is definitely Jamaican culture; again, the art form itself. But does it's lyrical content always express "Jamaican culture"? Of course, this will invite the question: What is Jamaican culture? Are lewdness and violence Jamaican culture, even though they abound there? Should we just settle for the simplistic view that it is 'art imitating life'?
And if we talk economics: is there a demand for it abroad in such a quantity that a number of artistes think they have to 'supply' it? Well, we're seeing one aspect of the backlash. I think eventually money will talk, and the artists and record companies will understand that language clearly.
</div></div>

Comment